Moderators place those messages on posts that fail to comply with guidelines to "show your work", which is a requirement here.

Now that a source is cited for your assertions about the meaning of various lemmata, the post is compliant with the requirement to 'show your work', and so the 'yellow box' has been removed.¹

Please see the following posts:

• What does “show your work” mean in the context of exegesis?
• Strong's is a concordance, not a lexicon

_{¹ I would also note that using a concordance as a lexicon is not how it is intended to be used. A concordance can be helpful in giving a general understanding of the lemma's meaning, but this should not be used as the sole source to justify the meaning or definition of the word in a specific textual context. Even so, you did show a source, albeit a poor one for asserting the meaning of a word in a specific context.}

Moderators place those messages on posts that fail to comply with guidelines to "show your work", which is a requirement here.

Now that a source is cited for your assertions about the meaning of various lemmata, the post is compliant with the requirement to 'show your work', and so the 'yellow box' has been removed.¹

Please see the following posts:

• What does “show your work” mean in the context of exegesis?
• Strong's is a concordance, not a lexicon

_{¹ I would also note that using a concordance as a lexicon is not how it is intended to be used. A concordance can be helpful in giving a general understanding of the lemma's meaning, but this should not be used as the sole source to justify the meaning or definition of the word in a specific textual context. Even so, you did show a source, albeit a poor one for asserting the meaning of a word in a specific context.}