Timeline for IS it off topic to address theological aspects of the text?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mi.yodeya.com/ with https://judaism.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/ with https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 17, 2014 at 21:42 | comment | added | user2027 | I am sorry Dan, I did misunderstand/misread your conversation. And thank you for this answer as it also helped me understand where you were coming from in the conversation. I quite agree that historical (as in historical context), linguistic and literary aspects most help to establish the meaning of the text and avoid venturing into doctrinal application of the text, (and also most avoid vain disputing). Thank you for clearing that up. | |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 18:21 | history | answered | DanMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |