4

This question has been asked before, but now that the site has had some time to find it's feet and the community is taking shape, we need to survey what the current thinking is.

Below is a list of all the previous suggestions I could find - please add any others I've missed and discuss in the comments.

Please note this from Robert Cartaino:

Name changes can be disruptive, but they can be done when they are demonstrably better at describing the site... but URL changes really should be, like, game-changing-we-HAVE-to-have-this better. That's what the meta discussions will decide.

3
  • Similar question about the title
    – Jack Douglas
    Nov 8, 2011 at 9:49
  • 1
    @Robert it was decided decided to split the original question into two, asking for suggestions just for the URL and just for the title.
    – Jack Douglas
    Nov 8, 2011 at 14:57
  • 1
    I went ahead and closed that previous question as a duplicate of the two questions that have been split out, in light of the development and new understanding that we are gaining as a community.
    – Richard
    Nov 8, 2011 at 15:11

8 Answers 8

Reset to default
12

hermeneutics.stackexchange.com

1
  • I like this because of the historical weight that it has.
    – Richard
    Nov 8, 2011 at 11:46
5

biblicaltexts.stackexchange.com

3
  • 3
    As mentioned in chat, I like this one because of the emphasis on the text.
    – GalacticCowboy
    Nov 8, 2011 at 15:31
  • I suggested an associated title here.
    – Jon Ericson
    Nov 8, 2011 at 17:58
  • I like this because it's much easier to spell and still excludes "Bible" from the url (although it does include "biblical").
    – Richard
    Nov 11, 2011 at 13:39
2

exegesis.stackexchange.com

-2

bible.stackexchange.com

3
-3

biblicalscholarship.stackexchange.com

-4

bibleexperts.stackexchange.com

-4

biblescholars.stackexchange.com

-4

biblicalhermeneutics.stackexchange.com

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .