1

What information is being conveyed about an answer by doing this?

1
  • Hi! Welcome to the club! As a 'responsible' holder of more than 1 "-3" answer, I wish to convey that "you're not alone". I think Jack Douglas has a "-3" buried somewhere in his portfolio; other "♦'s" have accumulated them as well. Yes, I suppose it can mean "....work on your answer"; it can also mean "I don't like you or your answer-so there". As you develop a 'repertoire' where people can begin to "gauge" your responses, based on your prior work, you will discover less of them. At 1st it's disconcerting; but persevere. You have valuable contributions to make-don't take it personal. – Tau Nov 23 '15 at 5:33
6

Answers with very low net scores (negative -3 or below) as dimmed out as an indication that they have been judged not useful and thus not worth the attention of future readers. Anybody really interested is welcome to hover over them (which darkens them up) and read them, but the visual suggestion is that it's not worth it. In order to get a score like that at least three people before have had to read the answer and be willing to shell out 1 rep point (the cost of downvoting) in order to signal the community that a post is either not accurate or not useful. Downvoting can mean a lot of things to different people but no one person can dim a question, only a consensus will make that happen.

Net vote totals also affect the default sort order. The most useful answers (as upvoted by the community) will float to the top of the page. This is an indication that those answers should probably be read first and are most likely to be informative, helpful, and accurate answers to the question. The reverse of that is that the farther down in the list you get the less collective value has been seen in the answers. At the bottom of the list if there are negative scored answers that should be an indication that the community has seen a problem with them, and the -3 dimming effect is a kind of cut of to show that not just one or two people saw the issue but that there was actual consensus about the problematic post.

Remember not just anybody can downvote. It takes a small modicum of participation (earn 15 rep) just to upvote on this site. It takes much more (125) to downvote. This means that people from other SE sites that come over to this one with a 100 account association bonus can come out of the gate upvoting anything, but in order to downnvote you have to spend some time and contribute some posts and —hopefully— get a feel for how things work here. As downvoting also costs the voter rep, it's rare than new users do very much of it. Large numbers of downvotes on the same post almost always indicate the more established (and presumably knowledgeable) members of the site have agreed on the issue.

3
  • Thanks, Caleb. I can't fathom, how a problem with a particular aspect of an answer can cause the whole answer to be deemed worthy of a downvote. It's gives those who have the privilege to downvote a stick with which to beat someone who doesn't see things in the same light, and seems contrary to Paul's exhortation, to "... be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, in meekness instructing those that oppose...". You guys establish the "vibe" of this place, by the way you deal with the issues that arise. – enegue Nov 16 '15 at 7:09
  • 5
    @enegue The upvote-downvote model is well established in the large StackExchange network. It isn't peculiar to this site, but has been shaped out of much experience of this "Q&A" format. Please note, too, that this is not a Christian site, nor is it a forum. The model Caleb described should make clear that one or two people with an axe to grind are insufficient to "grey out" an answer. There is some responsibility for new users to acclimatize and learn, too! – Dɑvïd Nov 16 '15 at 8:05
  • @David. The note that this is not a Christian site is clearly an upvote for Christianity. Good point. I am acclimatizing to this site very nicely, thanks, David. – enegue Nov 16 '15 at 8:13
0

It means it has a score of at least -3. I think it may be hidden from visitors who aren't logged in too.

2
  • Thank you, curiousdannii. I suspected that it was disabled in some way. – enegue Nov 16 '15 at 2:26
  • 3
    I just logged out to check, and I was still able to see the gray answers. – Susan Nov 16 '15 at 4:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .